Rilaly's Blog
Simple Truths

Archive for the ‘Nebraska Issues’ Category

Bob Kerry will run for Nebraska’s Senate seat

February 29, 2012

The moment we Nebraskans have been crossing our fingers over for so long that we nearly went blind is finally here! Bob Kerry has informed Democrats to inform MSNBC to inform people to inform people from Nebraska that he has decided to run for the Senate seat that Nebraskans allowed Ben Nelson to occupy for twelve years. For those broken hearted Democrats that have longed for this day, after being rejected so many times for better opportunies, Bob is apparently ready to scrape the bottom of the barrel and give us his representation.

Buffet cries foul on secretary’s critics

January 27, 2012

Warren Buffet, the oracle of Omaha, and chairman of the Berkshire Hathaway mutual fund, launched his secretary into the limelight by saying that it’s unfair that she pays more in federal income taxes than he does. The first question many have had is if we’re going to reform this nation’s tax code based on how much this particular secretary pays in federal income taxes, shouldn’t we know how much she makes? Both Buffet and Ms. Bosanek have said that that’s private information. Buffet did announce that she’s paying 35.8%, and he’s paying 17.4%. Based upon those numbers, the next logical question is how are each of you declaring your taxes, as total income or dividend or capital gains? Buffet’s response to these questions, thus far, has been to call them personal attacks against Ms. Bosanek. He’s amplified his response by saying these criticisms are ‘ridiculous’.

In an interview with The World-Herald, Buffet said none of the online guesses about Bosanek’s salary are right, and the critics are missing his point. The next logical question to that statement is what is your point? Do you want to raise capital gains taxes and discourage investment in this country? Knowing Mr. Buffet’s position and stature in this country, one would think that that would be anathema to him, as he should understand how vital private investment is to the companies in this nation and the nation as a whole. Buffet has decided not to illustrate his point for us in this manner. He simply wants his complaints about tax rates out there, and he wants the statements he makes about the general unfairness of the tax code to be left as a general statement.

“I’m saying she is being treated unfairly in the tax code, as are tens of millions of others, compared to me,” Buffett said. “They shouldn’t change the rates on all the other people. They should change mine.”

Stressed out, but working, in Omaha

January 26, 2012

Omaha is one of the top telemarketing markets in America. I’ve heard that this is due to the fact that we are one of the most plain spoken people in America today. Me thinks it also has something to do with the fact that the cost of living is low in Omaha, and as a result so are the wages.

Restaurants are also huge in Omaha. The marketing line on restarurants in Omaha is: “If you can make it in Omaha, you can probably make it anywhere.” Again, this may be due to the wages and the cost of living, but Omaha has also been said to have some of the most common tastes in America.

I list the traits of Omaha in this manner to lay the foundation for the fact that I know that working in Omaha is the same as working in Duluth, Albuquerque, Monroe, and Pocatello. If something is going right in America, it’s usually going right in Omaha, likewise if times are getting tough. Telemarketing and restaurant jobs are all over America, so I know that my plight in the workforce is no different than any other unqualified worker in any part of America, but that doesn’t mean that I’m going to hold back. I know I’m lucky to have a job, but I’m over that. I usually get over it about two weeks in when the reality of what I have to do slides down on me.

Bob Kerry mulls Senate run

January 24, 2012

Even in the local, Omaha media outlets one never hears who is funding ads designed to make Republicans look bad. How many Nebraska ads are characterized as those run by George Soros? When it’s a Democrat that looks bad, we get sources and characterization of those funding the ad, and we get attempts to diminish the ad before we even read the article about it.

If you’ve read the stories of Kerry’s mulling, you’d think that the only people against Kerry’s proposed run are Karl Rove and the Koch brothers. From what I hear that’s not the end of the list. People from small town Nebraska and…Omaha are saying that this guy has a long road ahead of him if he hopes to win my vote. Ask Nelson how easy it is to win a Senate seat without Omaha, ask Pete Ricketts.

Everyone knows that the only reason Ben Nelson isn’t running for re-election is his vote for Obamacare. Everyone knows that Tea Party pressure dug at Nelson to such a degree, over the vote, that he couldn’t take it anymore. Why someone who publicly supports the same health care initiative that Ben Nelson wouldn’t even consider mentioning in a pizza parlor would run for the seat Nelson once occupied has many Nebraskans scratching their head. He may as well wear a Longhorn cap to a press conference just to see if he can secure the Longhorn constiuency here. (There are some here, trust me.)

Why would the DNC turn to Kerry in a last ditch effort to secure the seat with someone more prone to vote for the Health Care bill than Nelson? Is it celebrity status? Do the Democrats think that we yokels in the cornfields will get so impressed with him that we’ll fall all over ourselves to get some star-studded representation in the Senate? Do they think that Nebraskans will greet him like Elvis returning home to Memphis?

Kerry’s new tag line is: “I’ve probably paid more income and property taxes than all the Republican candidates combined.” Ok, fair enough, you have made a ton of money in this state, but how many times, while president of the liberal New School, did you espouse conservative, Nebraska views. How many times did you even mention this state in your time in the Big Apple Bob?

Nebraska: Redistricting rides to final vote

May 24, 2011

A Democrat-led filibuster of a congressional redistricting plan was headed off Monday, but only after one sick senator received a ride to the State Capitol and another returned from work in an Omaha courtroom.

The 33-15 vote to end the filibuster — the bare minimum needed — allowed the GOP-dominated Nebraska Legislature to advance a plan that would move eastern Sarpy County, including Bellevue and Offutt Air Force Base, out of its longtime home in the Omaha-centered 2nd Congressional District.

Nebraska redistricting plan for electoral districts filibustered

May 23, 2011

State Sen. Russ Karpisek of Wilber has expressed a concern that we are all very worried about. We all want to give Democratic candidates in the 1st District a fairer chance at being elected. It’s rare that you see a political candidate, even one at a local level, speak in such a partisan manner, and make that partisanship appear somehow C.S. (Common Sense). If Kaprisek were a first grade student talking about another first grade student sharing his blocks, I would tell him that he has to share his legos too. It’s not just selfish if someone else doesn’t share, I would tell little Russy, it’s also selfish if you don’t share. I would then define partisanship for him and tell him that when Democrats act in a partisan manner, that is also considered partisanship. As I’ve learned many times, it’s tough to read tone in print. Kaprisek may have been laughing his tail off when he said all this, but I’ll just have to read the words and decide for myself whether he was serious or not.

Nebraska Cornhusker coach bites back against ACLU

September 17, 2010

The original Establishment Clause says that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion. CONGRESS shall make no law. It doesn’t say anything about a couple individuals speaking at a voluntary assembly. The Establishment Clause was set up to avoid a circumstance similar to the actions that occurred in England when England set up a national religion: The Church of England. It was set up to avoid having CONGRESS favor one religion over another. It did not say that Congress, or public school speakers, have to avoid public displays of religion. It does not prohibit the government’s entry into religious domain to make accommodations in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause. The Free Exercise Clause says that Congress cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion. If the ACLU wants to cite 5-4 interpretations made by the Supreme Court in later cases, they should cite them, but to say that “The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause forbids endorsement of religion in the public school setting” is factually incorrect.

While we’re on the topic, there is no Constitutional statement regarding the separation of church and state. The “wall of separation” was made in an informal letter from President Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists. It was Jefferson’s interpretation of the Establishment Clause that led him to believe that there should be a wall of separation. The exact quote is as follows: “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.” This has been quoted by Supreme Court’s so often that proponents of “the wall” have misled individuals into believing that the statement is, in fact, in The Constitution or that’s it’s Constitutional.

Nebraska A.G. defends Arizona illegal immigrant law

July 16, 2010

Liberals made questioning motives a part-time job during the Bush administration. In an effort to be consistent, we must then question the motives of the Obama Administration. Hispanics voted for Obama in the 2008 presidential election by a 67% to 31% margin. Hispanics are currently registered Democrat over Republican by a margin of 57% to 23%. Would the Obama administration’s DOJ still be lax in its attempts to curb illegal immigration if the poll numbers on Hispanics were reversed? If one argues that the DOJ and the administration genuinely believe that legalizing illegal citizens by way of amnesty is the right thing to do, regardless of the poll numbers, one has to wonder if they would take that belief a step further to a lawsuit against a state if the poll numbers were reversed.

Tom Osborne, the Big 10, and Politics and Football

June 11, 2010

Most people do not know that there was some politics that happened prior to the formation of the Big 12. I do not profess to know everything that happened in the closed door conferences but I know what I know, and I can only speculate about the rest.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.