The Other Side of Talent

“He has a talent,” one person said of another.  “I don’t know what it is,” she furthered, “but he has a real knack for taking photos.”  The subject of that compliment beamed in the afterglow.  The compliment was vague, but she used the ‘T’ word, and very few can avoid the gush that follows a ‘T’ word being thrown at them.

It was a nice photo (not the one pictured here), but the ‘T’ word?  The compliment suggested that this photo was but one of a long line of photos that you had to see to believe, but it was still just a photo.

07A355CB-376D-49E9-B923-287E6BF91C11C853959B-E628-475D-8660-C7389026F9A9Most of us reserve our use of the ‘T’ word for athletic and artistic accomplishments, but we know that it can be used in broader terms.  We know, for example, that an engineer can display a wide array of talents for his craft that others may not have, but we often say that that person is good at what he does, a master craftsman, or expertly skilled, but the use of the word talent is not often used in conjunction with most skills.

Some could say that a grown man’s ability to outdo children in the game of hopscotch is a display of talent, but most fellow adults watching this man hop from square to square might think that he should consider finding a more constructive use of his abilities, if he wants to be considered talented.

Merriam-Webster defines talent as “a special ability that allows someone to do something well.”

Philosopher Ayn Rand steadfastly refused to recognize photography as art, but she did concede that it requires a skill, a technical skill, as opposed to a creative one.

We all know that definitions, such as these, can be broad, but most of us have personal definitions that fall on stricter lines. If the definition of talent is as broad as Merriam-Webster described, and photography is a technical skill, then we are forced to concede that taking a quality photograph does require some talent.  One could also say that a talented photographer uses discretion and selectivity when he selects his shot, but could this ability to capture a moment be more of a right place, right time decision making process that this man has than even the broadest definition of talent?

If one takes a thousand photographs, for example, and only one of them is of an exceptional quality, is that a display of the photographer’s skill?  Yes it is, in a broad sense of the term. If that’s the case, it could also be said that if a man takes a thousand free throws, and he makes one, he has a talent for shooting free throws, if that one free throw is so perfect that it barely touches the net.

If a photographer purchases a top of the line camera, and he uses the best photo-enhancing software available to produce evidence of his prowess, and he lays that photo down on a table next to the photo another taken with a disposable Walmart camera, and no enhancements, does his superior photo reveal God-given talents on his part, or does it contribute to the lie that a skilled, talented photographer is artistic in any manner?

The Truly Talented

1741685_origWe’ve all witnessed the effect truly talented people can have on a room, and this effect often makes us a little sick.   “He’s just a human being for God’s sakes!” is one of the snarky, coping mechanisms we’ve developed for dealing with “the gush” to adore the talented.

The adoration of talent varies with the skill required to accomplish the feat, of course, but if you’ve ever met truly gifted people, you know that most of them are not interested in being better today than they were yesterday.  Most of them enjoy the potential they have to be better than they do the work involved in becoming better.  “We’re talking about practice!”

Those that do become obsessed with being better, and enjoy the benefits the rigors of practice can produce, often end up having their names etched into something by the time they’re finished.  For these people, their talent is but a starting point and a gift that they end up honing to perfection, but even for these people talent can become a curse and a burden, and it can lead to them to being accepted, loved, worshiped, scrutinized, ostracized, hated, and ridiculed.  It can also lead them to being haunted by the occasional limits of their talent.

This other side of talent was portrayed in an edition of 30 for 30 called Of Miracles and Men.  It depicted the other side of the Miracle on Ice story that we all know of a ragtag group of American amateurs defeating the most talented Russian hockey team ever assembled.  Some would argue that this Russian team may have been the greatest assemblage of hockey players ever to tie skates on their feet.  This team had already won four Olympic gold medals in hockey by the time they met this American team, and some of them would go onto win a fifth.  To hear this group of talented men speak of their careers, the 1980 loss to a group of American amateurs, in a medal round, sits in their system like a kidney stone that will never pass.  This Russian team beat an assemblage of Canada’s best, they beat a team of America’s best and Canada’s best, and that latter team included probably the greatest hockey player that ever lived Wayne Gretzky.  They also beat the 1980 American team in a match that preceded the 1980 medal round upset, and those matches were not even close.  This team was so dominant that they could not be beat, until they were.

Some would think that such an historic upset might serve to highlight the Russian team’s greatness, if one could say that one defeat in the midst of a record of total annihilation, is a blip in the overall dominance this team displayed over the hockey world for two decades.  Listening to these men speak, however, the listener gets taste for the other side of talent when the only story anyone wants to hear from them involves the one time they didn’t succeed, and how that has haunted their lives since.

The point one could take from this show is that these men spent an excruciating amount of hours of their young lives in cold, dank gyms honing their God-given gifts, trying to improve on the smallest details of the game, only to fall to a bunch of ragtag Americans that may not have spent one-fifths the amount of time honing their gifts.  Even with five gold medals (including the 1984 Olympics), the only thing we want to talk to them about is that one match they failed to win thirty-five years ago.

If you’re acknowledged to be the most talented person anyone you know has ever met, and the only thing anyone wants to discuss is the one time you failed, why would you want to raise their expectations?  Why would you want to endure the marathon practice sessions that focused on the minutiae your coach informed was going to be vital when you encountered the wall of your God-given abilities?  Why would you want to invest more of your life getting better at something other people hate you for being so good at?  We’re talking about desire here.

We’re talking about the desire to be better today, than you were yesterday.  “We’re talking about practice!”  We’re talking about preparing for that day, that every talented person experiences, when they meet their personal wall.

The wall, for those that have never read about it, involves going up against other people that were the most talented people anyone they know had ever met.  It involves seeing what the gifted person is made of when they encounter the other person that is so gifted with talent, that talent is afterthought.

To read the former NFL quarterback Kurt Warner’s examination of the natural talents that fail to succeed on the NFL level, it’s about having a coach, or mentor, early on that recognizes the person’s talent level, and challenges them in a brutal, heartless manner, to reach within themselves to find various other methods of succeeding beyond the talent level they’ve always known.  This heartless mentor also helps the talented person in question determine if they have the desire to succeed on a level they may not have even considered to that point.

The Less Than Talented

“My talent has always been, and will always be, and it should be written with a capital ‘P’!” –Your potential

What if your talent has never taken you the places you thought it would, but you’ve always known you had the potential you had to succeed?  What if your talent lays somewhere between being as talented as anyone that you’ve ever met, and perhaps more, but that untapped potential to be more has always been at a frustrating distance?

We spoke of ‘the wall’ that every recognized talent experiences, but there is another wall that can be more formidable: the wall of self-imposed expectations.  This wall can be encountered in moments considered inconsequential to other participants, and observers, but to the person that has lived with the idea that they’ve always had the potential to succeed, it is but another example of their ineptitude. Most of them do not know that this is the source of the displays of their frustration, or if they do, they won’t acknowledge it.

As the Kurt Warner story informs us, the primary difference between those that will succeed and those that won’t occurs soon after an example of their ineptitude occurs.  Moments of adversity can be large and small, but they all reveal who we are, and who we are going to be.

A young Kurt Warner may have dealt with moments of adversity throughout his largely undocumented young life, but we can guess that none of them would compare to the adversity that the adult Kurt Warner would experience in his adult life.  The most talented person in his area received so few scholarship offers that he ended up playing quarterback for the University of Northern Iowa.  He was not drafted in the NFL draft following that college career, and he was cut from the only NFL team that gave him a try-out before the season started.  He ended up stocking shelves for a supermarket chain.  He then played quarterback in the Arena Football League, and this was followed by a stint in NFL Europe, before an injury to a starter allowed him to lead a NFL team to a Super Bowl victory.  He was MVP of that Super Bowl, and MVP for the season.  He was cut from that team seasons later, and went onto play for another NFL team for a couple of unproductive seasons, and he ended up with another team that he, again, guided to the Super Bowl.  After Kurt Warner’s career was concluded, he was considered to be the best undrafted player to ever play the game.

Kurt Warner’s story of not living up to his self-imposed expectations, and what he did after failing to succeed on many levels, should be held out as an example to talented people, but for most of those that are more talented than anyone they’ve ever met, talent and work have always been a zero-sum game: The more talent one has, the less work they should have to do.

Warner basically states most coaches and mentors coach to the talent, and they let the talent do what they do well in a manner that the coach hopes will reflect the coach’s ability to harness talent.  They coach for the next game.  They coach to keep the talent happy.

If we’re talking about practice, however, one of a coach’s duties should be to put talented people in uncomfortable positions to reveal to them what they must do when talent alone may not be enough get them out of scrapes.

It also allows those talented people –that have always used their talent as a picket sign to avoid the rigors of practice– to learn how to finesse their abilities and hone their desire.

As anyone that has displayed an ability to do anything knows, there is always a ceiling, and when one hits their head on that ceiling it can be quite humiliating.  Some of the times, it’s more rewarding to hide in a cloud of potential.  Those of us that are considered lesser-thans don’t understand what it must feel like to be considered a true talent, and we never will, and that can provide the talented a comfortable space between the reality of their talent and the potential we believe they might have.

If you’ve ever witnessed a display of YouTube-worthy temper tantrum in a bowling alley, on a miniature golf course, or at a softball field, and you’ve wondered why a person would attempt to gouge their own eye out for missing a two-foot putt, I can tell you –as a former wild temper tantrum thrower– that there’s something more to it than the fact that the ball won’t go where we want it to.  We thought we spotted something at a very young age, we thought we were going to be a somebody, a contender, and the obnoxious five-pin that will not fall no matter what we do is not just a configuration of rock maple wood to us, it is the eye of fate staring at us, mocking us for what we’ve become.

These eye-catching temper tantrums are borne of an inability to deal with even the most inconsequential moments of adversity, because we never had a heartless mentor in our lives that cared enough not to care that we were tired, that our feelings were hurt by something they said, or that we wanted to quit the game because “it’s just not fun anymore”.  And one could read this post, and think it’s all about sports, until you witness a guy that has no capacity for dealing with the obnoxious five-pins of life, and in the moment that captures his frustration in life for all to see, he does something to the ball return that parents attempt to shield their children from.  For an overwhelming majority of those that would have their names etched into something by the time their career is over, their mentors would spend countless hours teaching them how to deal with such adversity, how to overcome walls –self-imposed and otherwise– and how to become successful people, and yes, talented photographers, I guess.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s